 |
Battle of the bad guys? Many see it that way.
|
A few hours after I publish this post, two of the world's most reviled football clubs will meet in the first match of the Champions League semifinals in Lisbon, Portugal. (Normally, there would be home/away ties for these clubs in their respective stadiums, but the pandemic has forced them to play a single winner-takes-all match in relatively COVID-free Lisbon as a neutral site. Needless to say, the thousands of fans are also missing.) This being the International Political Economy Zone, we have international politics in abundance with Paris Saint-Germain [PSG] being bankrolled by the Qatari government, and international economics too with RB Leipzig being bankrolled by drinks company Red Bull.
To be sure, there is a good chance that it will be a good match to watch. Among other stars, PSG features Brazilian drama queen Neymar and the rather more likeable (to me, at least) French speedster Kylian Mbappe. Meanwhile, RB Leipzig features a bevy of up-and-coming young stars. For all that, though, the way these teams got here--and many say they shouldn't be here at all if fair play were observed--make them arguably the two most hated teams in world football.
Let's begin with PSG. Although the pandemic has smashed the fortunes of Middle Eastern oil and gas-exporting nations--including PSG's benefactor Qatar--that came after it had already spent EUR1 billion-plus trying to win this biggest prize in the global game--the Champions League. Qatar likes to portray itself as a progressive absolute monarchy, but many would of course point out that is an oxymoron. Two of Qatar's most visible attempts to make its regime more palatable are the TV network Al Jazeera, which likes bashing other Middle Eastern nations for totalitarianism when, er, it is sponsored by one of its practitioners. So in more recent years, they came upon the gambit of purchasing a languishing Ligue 1 franchise, spending big loading it up with high-priced talent, and winning heaven knows how many of the France's league titles amid less competitive opposition:
PSG have spent over a billion Euros since their takeover, and have become virtually unassailable in their domestic league, winning seven of the last eight Ligue 1 titles.
The malice directed at them, however, isn’t due to the amount of money
they spend. It’s the source of the money, and what it represents. The
club is fully backed by a Gulf state that is frequently criticized for
denouncing basic human rights. PSG stands accused of being a tool of
political “soft power,” whereby Qatar aims to increase its appeal and standing in the western world via its megastar-laden soccer team...
For
many, however, PSG’s combination of problematic funding, a lack of
history and a healthy dose of hubris form a particularly unedifying
combination. Thus, Tuesday’s Champions League semifinal is the Battle of the Maligned Monoliths. It is not Paris against Leipzig; it is Political Influence against Rampant Commercialism.
Admittedly, I dislike PSG more than RB Leipzig. Making a mockery of UEFA's financial fair play rules, it has bought its way thus far into the semis. They have more connections to Qatar than to their city or country, and seems smugly content beating up other French teams unable to muster the same kind of financial muscle. Elsewhere in the commentary above, while the Premier League's Manchester City (Abu Dhabi) and Chelsea (Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich) have equally problematic ownership, these are clubs with substantial histories that could stand apart from their current owners. The same cannot be said for PSG.
How about RB Leipzig, then? Its story is well-known: Red Bull bought a fifth-tier club, renamed it RB Leipzig (RB stands for RassenBallsport, although it's really a not-so-subtle abbreviation of Red Bull), and has since blossomed into one of the Bundesliga's top clubs. Germans are purists about their football clubs, believing that they should be substantially run by the fans who provide inputs on their operations. RB Leipzig upends all that, inviting much ire in their home country since it makes no pretensions about being anything more than a marketing ploy for Red Bull:
The Independent has meanwhile been told of one early meeting at
RB Leipzig, when Red Bull owner Dietrich Mateschitz was asked about the
project. “Oh, it is a commercial enterprise,” Mateschitz said. “I won’t
sell one extra can through this, but we will create a lot of brand
awareness.” A phrase as corporate as “brand awareness” isn’t what most of us got
into football for. And while it’s true the purpose is not as
consequential as soft power or sportswashing, it is questionable, and
provokes a lot of debate about the direction of the game and its role.
That difference over what the game is supposed to be for fosters the central tension around RB Leipzig.
While figures like Mateschitz see it is a vehicle for commerce,
German football culture sees it as about community representation, and
much more than the match. It is a communal experience, where they have
agency. This is a viewpoint that was most aggressively articulated by
magazine 11Freunde this week, who announced they are refusing
to cover Tuesday’s semi-final. “RB Leipzig isn’t a football club, but an
imitation… it never intended on just playing football.”
Unlike PSG, though, RB Leipzig has rather more welcome attributes. For starters, its wage bill is nowhere as large as PSG's, and it has achieved success in one of Europe's more competitive leagues with many journeymen of little pedigree. Leipzig's manager is only 33 years old. It's also in the economically less-prosperous former East Germany, which earns it additional sympathy...albeit from non-Germans like me:
What’s more, they’ve managed it in quite a progressive way. Their entire
team will cost less than half of Neymar’s fee, and just over a half of
Kylian Mbappe’s. They are as refreshing a new face in the Champions
League semi-finals as they are at the top of the Bundesliga.
If RB Leipzig were not controlled and owned by a domineering drinks giant selling quite unhealthy, sugar-laden beverages and were run by the fans instead, it would be considered as a good example of how to nurture a modern club. But it isn't run that way, and for some it makes all the difference. Me, I am not a German purist, so I am more lukewarm about it. PSG, though, is hard to cast as anything but a panto villain people describe it to be. Money usually talks in sport, but sometimes people get offended when some do not take any pains to downplay this fact.
Anyway, here's hoping it's a good game. From the above, you won't be surprised this neutral is rooting for Red Bull (for the first time ever!)
