♠ Posted by Emmanuel in Economic Diplomacy
at 12/01/2010 12:01:00 AM
Whatever happened to the Financial Stability Board (FSB) that came into effect during the earlier G-20 meetings? It didn't have much to say to the G-20 at the most recent meetings in Seoul. The reasons why we haven't heard much about this Bank of International Settlements (BIS)-hosted entity since then can stem from two major sources: (a) it isn't doing enough that merits attention or (b) the work it does is highly technical and isn't ready fodder for the business sections of newspapers. As Eric Helleiner explains in his new article in Global Policy, it's likely a mix of both reasons as to why its profile has been relatively low. Given the difficulty of the tasks it faces, chances of widespread accord on current proposals remain low. What follow are the abstract and the policy implications from the article though the rest is of course well worth reading:---------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT
Created in April 2009, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) represents the G20 leaders’ first major international institutional innovation. Why was it established and what role will it play in global economic governance? The creation of the FSB has been linked to a US-led effort to strengthen an international prudential standards regime that had evolved in the years leading up to the 2007–08 global financial crisis. The FSB faces a number of serious challenges in its new role: developing effective mechanisms for monitoring and encouraging compliance; promoting the development of effective international standards and fostering consensus on their content; establishing its legitimacy vis-à-vis non-members and within member countries; and clarifying its relationship with other global governance institutions. Since these are very difficult tasks, the FSB may be forced to assume a less ambitious role in international regulatory politics than some of its creators initially envisioned.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
- The creation of the FSB is part of an ambitious effort to strengthen international prudential standards in response to the recent global financial crisis.
- The FSB faces many challenges: developing effective mechanisms for monitoring and encouraging compliance; promoting the development of effective international standards and fostering consensus on their content; establishing its legitimacy vis-à-vis non-members and within member countries; and clarifying its relationship with other global governance institutions.
- If these challenges prove too daunting, the FSB can still play an important, though less ambitious, role of fostering international cooperation to support a more pluralistic and decentralized international regulatory order.
