♠ Posted by Emmanuel in Europe
at 2/09/2009 08:36:00 AM
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/460af/460afad4b68ad8df602a73fb8f35fb307cd97104" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40167/40167500b6f2b5e588631025d96315d53a6c4625" alt=""
[This] view fits into a debate about whether Britain should attempt to “rebalance” its economy back towards manufacturing. The notion has grown in recent months that the country that gave the world the industrial revolution now suffers from the fact that it “no longer makes things”. According to the resultant stream of rhetoric, “reindustrialisation” is the key to boosting the economy in the aftermath of the financial crisis.
"For the future, Britain needs an economy with less financial engineering and more real engineering,” Lord Mandelson, the business secretary, recently told parliament [now you're telling us, Mandy]. Opposition politicians and leading industrialists have echoed his sentiments – in a debate whose importance reaches beyond the UK. As one of the first developed economies to deindustrialise, Britain’s approach to bolstering the sector is potentially applicable to other countries.
Sir Anthony Bamford, chairman and owner of the JCB excavators group, is keen to highlight some of the difficulties, especially at a time when UK manufacturing has been severely hit by the recession – with its output plummeting in recent months at above the rate for other sectors. “I’d hate to give up on British manufacturing,” he says. “But we’ve lost an awful lot [of manufacturing production] in the UK in recent years and it’s going to be hard to bring it back.”
In 2007 manufacturing accounted for less than 13 per cent of UK value-added output at current prices, compared with nearly 33 per cent in 1970 and a peak of close to 40 per cent in the 1950s. Some 3m people now work in manufacturing, compared with 7m in 1980 and a high of 8m in the 1950s. (By comparison, some 6.5m are employed in financial services, up from 3m in 1980.)