3 Greek Riot Fatalities; Indonesia in May 98? 1500

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in ,,, at 5/07/2010 12:01:00 AM
It is a sad fact of life that we are often disconnected to those suffering calamities by increasing removes based on distance and dissimilarity from ourselves. Adam Smith profoundly stated this case in the Theory of Moral Sentiments given the hypothetical situation of China in its entirety being consumed by an earthquake (and a European caring little):
Let us suppose that the great empire of China, with all its myriads of inhabitants, was suddenly swallowed up by an earthquake, and let us consider how a man of humanity in Europe, who had no sort of connection with that part of the world, would be affected upon receiving intelligence of this dreadful calamity. He would, I imagine, first of all, express very strongly his sorrow for the misfortune of that unhappy people, he would make many melancholy reflections upon the precariousness of human life, and the vanity of all the labours of man, which could thus be annihilated in a moment. He would too, perhaps, if he was a man of speculation, enter into many reasonings concerning the effects which this disaster might produce upon the commerce of Europe, and the trade and business of the world in general. And when all this fine philosophy was over, when all these humane sentiments had been once fairly expressed, he would pursue his business or his pleasure, take his repose or his diversion, with the same ease and tranquillity, as if no such accident had happened. The most frivolous disaster which could befall himself would occasion a more real disturbance. If he was to lose his little finger to-morrow, he would not sleep to-night; but, provided he never saw them, he will snore with the most profound security over the ruin of a hundred millions of his brethren, and the destruction of that immense multitude seems plainly an object less interesting to him, than this paltry misfortune of his own.
In this manner we can begin to understand some of the mass hysteria now ongoing with Greece. It seems every news article believes it necessary to begin with a reference to three fatalities that have occurred there caused by rioters. Being someone with a much longer memory, I simply wonder why the whitebread commentariat finds it so exceptional that something of this sort could happen in a tense environment.

Moreover, it pales in comparison to events that struck Indonesia back in May of 1998 when it too had financial troubles that required calling in the IMF. A few days ago, I made a somewhat lengthy post on how Malaysia has gone to great lengths to forestall a rehash of the race riots of 1971 via the implementation of its bumiputra or affirmative action policies. Whereas the global business class simply thinks of these policies as a form of backdoor protectionism, let us recall the outbreak of race riots in neighbouring Indonesia circa May 1998. Fuelled by massive discontent against strict IMF strictures, many rioters turned violent against the economically dominant ethnic Chinese, resulting in an estimated 1,500 deaths. Although bumiputra isn't something the neoliberal crowd would welcome, think of what could have likewise occurred had such policies not been in place as Malaysia combated financial crisis. An even stronger viewpoint would suggest that the Indonesian leadership of the time could have used ethnic hatreds to blunt anti-government sentiment.

Surprisingly, there is only limited research work into the May 1998 race riots in Indonesia. Still, some Indonesian researchers have used geographic information software (GIS) to study these incidents and come up with the following:
-> The highest concentration of damaged buildings overlaps with villages that have a dominant Buddhist (i.e., ethnic Chinese) population.
-> The damage to buildings was also concentrated in villages with dominant commercial activity [read: looting of shops owned by ethnic Chinese].
-> From the spatiotemporal aspect of the riots, a certain pattern emerges that shows the initial points of violence distributed in a wide area (average interpoint distances of 6.5 km). The start times of the riots at those initial points are relatively similar. Therefore, it can be concluded that the riots began in distributed points around Jakarta simultaneously.

From these results, it is suggested that there is a connection between the riot and ethnicity, especially toward ethnic Chinese and economic issues. There appeared to be a greater degree of destruction in those commercial areas with Businesses operated by ethnic Chinese residents. The implication of this is that the riot was ethnically motivated due to negative sentiment of the indigenous people to the relatively more prosperous ethnic Chinese.

In addition, the spatially dispersed distribution but spontaneous initial occurrences of the riot indicates an unnatural event. This implies that the riot might have been caused and designed intentionally. Typically, the spread of a spontaneous riot is like the ripples in a pond spreading out from the point of disturbance. In the May 1998 riot, however, there were several disturbances at the same time in several areas, from which a degree of intention is extrapolated.
While the events in Greece are indeed tragic, they measurably pale in comparison to those which occurred in Indonesia. The reasons which can be identified for comparable skittishness this time around is not really due to the magnitude of the violence. Rather, it's the prospect of further tumult in the world's foremost economic bloc and spillover effects into other economies given trends of global economic integration.

And then, of course, we have the Adam Smith-style arguments which are certainly worthy of a comment. These riots are occurring in Greece--a wellspring of European civilization that is not so far away as to be interesting enough. That many commentators are Westerners besides whose governments are incurring masses of debt also adds to the feeling of "gee, that could be us" as a British tabloid not so indiscreetly put it. In other words, it's not just a Malay-versus-Chinese melee in a faraway land but white-on-white violence inside the European Union.

Make no mistake: Greece is the "little finger" that keeps Westerners awake at night. OK, maybe Europeans in particular as Americans are, on the balance, famously incurious about the rest of the world and geographically illiterate besides. Hopefully, however, we are seeing the last few veneers of respectability of American-style debt accumulation being peeled away. In the meantime, it's better to keep matters in perspective.

UPDATE: Still we await the iconic IMF-related image in Greece alike the Camdessus-Suharto picture that preceded Indonesia's race riots and Suharto's eventual ouster.

Internet History: Non-Latin Top-Level Domains Live

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in at 5/07/2010 12:00:00 AM
I just wanted to make a quick note of this momentous occasion. While web pages using non-Latin characters have been in existence for quite a while, web addresses using wholly non-Latin characters have not. Again, this situation reflects lock-in effects of the Internet's heritage as a system for guaranteeing continued communication among US defence agencies in the event of a nuclear attack. The Cold War is long gone, but the pervasiveness of top-level domains (TLDs) in Latin characters remains.

Well, this situation may be about to change for the better. Unnoticed to many in the hullabaloo of turbulent markets is that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has finally begun implementing the use of non-Latin characters in TLDs--our .coms, .nets, and .orgs. Arabic, Chinese, Cyrillic, Japanese, Korean characters will soon be in wider use. The ICANN blog has an informative entry as well as a video concerning the time-consuming process of making this much-needed technical change. At any rate, the BBC identifies Arabic sites as the first out of the chute:
Arab nations are leading a "historic" charge to make the world wide web live up to its name. Net regulator Icann has switched on a system that allows full web addresses that contain no Latin characters. Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the first countries to have so-called "country codes" written in Arabic scripts.

The move is the first step to allow web addresses in many scripts including Chinese, Thai and Tamil. More than 20 countries have requested approval for international domains from the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (Icann). It said the new domains were "available for use now" although it admitted there was still some work to do before they worked correctly for everyone. However, it said these were "mostly formalities".

Icann's senior director for internationalised domain names, Tina Dam, told BBC News that this has been "the most significant day" since the launch of the internet, adding that "it's been a very big day for Icann, more so for the three Arabic countries that were the first to be introduced".

The introduction of the first web names using so-called country code top-level domains (CCTLDs) is the culmination of several years of work by the organisation. Previously, websites could use some non-Latin letters, but the country codes such as .eg for Egypt had to be written in Latin script.

The three new suffixes will allow web addresses to be completely written in native characters. "All three are Arabic script domains, and will enable domain names written fully right-to-left," said Kim Davies of Icann in a blog post. One of the first websites with a full Arabic address is the Egyptian Ministry of Communications.

Egypt's communication and information technology minister Tarek Kamal told the Associated Press that three Egyptian companies were the first to receive registrar licenses for the '.masr' domain, written in Arabic. Mr Kamal described the development as a "milestone in internet history". Masr means Egypt in Arabic.

Some countries, such as China and Thailand, had already introduced workarounds that allow computer users to enter web addresses in their own language. However, these were not internationally approved and do not necessarily work on all computers. Ms Dam explained that the change was "not about shutting non-Arabic or non-Chinese speakers out of the internet...It's about including that large part of our world into the internet today." She said there had previously been a risk the internet might have started to split. "The chances are people would start creating their own internets, where it was only in Chinese, Arabic, Thai or whatever," she said.
ICANN is making a big noise about this change, claiming the availability of non-Latin TLDs is the biggest change to the Internet since its birth some 40 years ago. Certainly, it's a good faith move to make the Internet seem less dominated by American interests via ICANN to permit wider use by those who wish to go online but have limited or no real use for learning English. Call it a welcome leap forward for Internet governance.

Anarchic UK-Greece Comparison of the Day

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in , at 5/06/2010 12:19:00 PM
Walking past the newsagent, I saw this image of a Greek riot policeman engulfed in flames on the cover of today's Daily Mail:

Let's just say understatement is not a tabloid's strong [flame-retardant?] suit!

Why EU Won't Play 'Bash RMB at WTO' With US

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in ,,, at 5/06/2010 12:04:00 AM
I almost forgot to post this, so today is as good a time as any. Nowadays, there is much commentary emanating from the Peterson Institute for International Economics--formerly just the Institute for International Economics--on how the United States should engage the World Trade Organization in bashing China over the value of the renminbi. Arvind Subramanian thundered that, well, a weak RMB is not just a problem for the United States but the rest of the world in a March op-ed in the Financial Times. Meanwhile, Peterson Institute Director Fred Bergsten has been, if anything else, even more strident than Subramanian in calling for congressional action. Here are some excerpts from what Fred said before the House Ways and Means Committee on "Correcting China's Exchange Rate: An Action Plan" on 24 March 2010--right before the Treasury decision on the currency practices of US trade partners scheduled for 15 April was delayed -
Much of the blame for this failure of policy to date falls on the US Government, which has been unwilling to label China the currency manipulator that it has been so clearly for a number of years. The unwillingness of the United States to implement the plain language of the Trade Act of 1988 has substantially undermined its credibility in seeking multilateral action against China in the IMF, the WTO, the G-20 or anywhere else. A sensible and effective strategy must begin by reversing that feckless position [but Dr. Bergsten, how do you really feel?]

Hence I would recommend that the Administration adopt a new three-part strategy to promote early and substantial appreciation of the exchange rate of the RMB:

1. Label China as a “currency manipulator” in its next foreign exchange report to the Congress on April 15 and, as required by law, then enter into negotiations with China to resolve the currency problem.

2. Hopefully with the support of the European countries, and as many emerging market and developing economies as possible, seek a decision by the IMF (by a 51 percent majority of the weighted votes of member countries) to launch a “special” or “ad hoc” consultation to pursue Chinese agreement to remedy the situation promptly. If the consultation fails to produce results, the United States should ask the Executive Board to decide (by a 70% majority of the weighted votes) to publish a report criticizing China’s exchange rate policy.

3. Hopefully with a similarly broad coalition, the United States should exercise its right to ask the World Trade Organization to constitute a dispute settlement panel to determine whether China has violated its obligations under Article XV (“frustration of the intent of the agreement by exchange action”) of the WTO charter and to recommend remedial action that other member countries could take in response. The WTO under its rules would ask the IMF whether the RMB is undervalued, another reason why it is essential to engage the IMF centrally in the new initiative from the outset.
Bergsten's China-bashing effort involves a rather optimistic sequence and, as you can read, a lot of "hopefully". First, Treasury must label the PRC a currency manipulator. Second, this action will supposedly prompt other aggrieved nations to impel the IMF into action by investigating China's antisocial currency practices. Third, the IMF having presumably determined that China is a currency manipulator, the anti-China bandwagon shifts fora to the WTO. At the WTO, the dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) can now rule on what sort of sanctions can be applied against China on the grounds that it violates Article XV of the GATT (text here).

As before, I believe that getting other countries to play along will the Peterson boys is a long shot. With so many developing countries still under "managed float" currency regimes similar to China's, it is unlikely that they will sign on to measures that will of course make them vulnerable to future currency bashing by Western nations in search of scapegoats. All the while, I can only wonder why Dr. Subramanian from India has such a narrow, parochial, and Amerocentric view of world politics.

And here's the punch line: a much more sensible voice is that of EC Trade Commissioner Karel de Gucht. Recently, the Belgian bigwig came to speak at the LSE and made much sense which is really no surprise as his current post is one of the most important posts in the EC. He basically scoffs at the notion that the EU will play along with an American action along these lines for the commonsense reason that China isn't likely to say yessuh, yessuh and back down easily:
Threatening China with WTO sanctions will not convince Beijing to revalue its currency, the European Union trade chief said following a meeting with his Chinese counterpart on Tuesday. Chinese Commerce Minister Chen Deming said the yuan was not undervalued and reiterated that China would only adjust the currency's exchange rate if it were beneficial to its own economy, EU trade commissioner Karel De Gucht said.

"I am quite convinced that they are going to do it for themselves and that openly insisting on it and even thinking about procedures within the WTO...is not going to resolve the matter," De Gucht told reporters. According to World Trade Organisation rules, countries are not permitted to use their exchange rate policies to counteract commitments to open trade. This stipulation about exchange rates has never been tested in practice in a WTO case.
Still, if the US is really up for it, I guess there's only one way to find out, eh?

EU: Screw Credit Rating Agencies; We'll Do Rating

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in ,,, at 5/05/2010 12:03:00 AM
Credit rating agencies have long been bogeymen for those facing down financial crises. During the Asian financial crisis, Ferri, Liu, and Stiglitz (1999) found these agencies complicit in procyclical ratings that worsened matters. Here is the abstract of their paper:
We demonstrate that credit rating agencies aggravated the East Asian crisis. In fact, having failed to predict the emergence of the crisis, rating agencies became excessively conservative. They downgraded East Asian crisis countries more than the worsening in these countries' economic fundamentals would justify. This unduly exacerbated, for these countries, the cost of borrowing abroad and caused the supply of international capital to them to evaporate. In turn, lower than deserved ratings contributed – at least for some time – to amplify the East Asian crisis. Although this goes beyond the scope of our paper, we also propose an endogenous rationale for rating agencies to become excessively conservative after having made blatant errors in predicting the East Asian crisis. Specifically, rating agencies would have an incentive to become more conservative, so as to recover from the damage these errors caused to them and to rebuild their own reputation.
Well it's 2010 and it seems these same credit rating agencies haven't learned their lesson at all. In this game of perception, have a gander at the view of market participants at what EU actions mean. To them, the ECB allowing Greek bonds to be used as collateral regardless of their credit rating is the latest in a long line of concessions to erring EMU countries:
Still, crucially, this isn't the first key rule behind the euro to be scrapped. Greece, and a number of the other 15 euro members, have already disregarded the rule that borrowing levels should be kept low. Another perceived rule, that no euro member should bail out another, has also been ignored. Now, market watchers warn that this fresh rule-bending exercise creates a further dent to the solidity of the single-currency project. "Junk debt is junk debt. You can't have different rules for different members of the euro. Otherwise, what's the point of having a single currency?" said Simon Derrick, a senior currencies analyst at The Bank of New York Mellon in London
Ah, well. Markets will markets, eh? Far more interesting has been the response from EU bigwigs, In particular, Michel Barnier, Commissioner for the Internal Market and Services, has been keen on policing the dreaded Anglo-Saxon abuses of the credit rating agencies:
"I think we need to go further to look at the impact of the ratings on the financial system or economic system as a whole...," European Internal Markets Commissioner Michel Barnier told members of the European Parliament. "That's why I asked for responsibility to be assumed in the work they are doing." Barnier added: "If you look at Greece, for example, I was quite surprised by the quite rapid deterioration in rating." His comments follow a reminder from the executive European Commission to rating agencies to be careful in their work.
The kicker, though, is that he's now proposing that the EU itself do the job of rating (or at least sponsor an organization doing so on the EU's behalf):
The European Union is examining plans to set up a European credit-ratings authority for sovereign debt ratings in the wake of the Greek crisis, the bloc’s top financial regulator said today. Financial Services Commissioner Michel Barnier is also examining whether ratings companies have too much power, he told the European Parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee in Brussels today.

“We are undertaking work on creating a European agency,” Barnier said. “We need a very fast, but not off-the-cuff reflection,” he said. “The power of these agencies is quite considerable, not just for products but also for states.” Scrutiny of credit-ratings companies intensified after Greece’s rating was last week cut to junk status.
Is it just me or are there similar conflicts of interest inherent here as when financial service concerns approached credit rating agencies soliciting business? While credit rating agencies' reputations are deservedly junk, you have to wonder if the alternative here can be made to be worth rather more. Yes, EMU countries are probably suffering from credit rating agencies' overreaction now as during the Asian crisis. However, the 'cure' may be worse than the disease.

Meet Malaysian 'Market-Friendly Affirmative Action'

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in at 5/05/2010 12:01:00 AM
I've long been fascinated by Malaysia's affirmative action or bumiputra policies which have been implemented since 1971 via the New Economic Policy (NEP). These policies favour Malays compared to the economically dominant minorities of Chinese descent who hold similar pride of place in the firmaments of other Southeast Asian countries. While many local commentators believe that they have reduced racial tensions and inequality since then, those in the international financial community have taken a dim view of them as, you guessed it, barely disguised protectionism. One of those who believe they've done good in general is the LSE's Head of Department in Economics, Danny Quah.

Now, Professor Quah is the very definition of an infrequent blogger. But, when he does blog, you can be sure that he's well worth reading. In a recent post, he provides a magisterial overview of where Malaysian policy is headed. He also happens to be part of Malaysia's New Economic Advisory Council (NEAC) that is determining a set of policies to replace the NEP imaginatively called the, you guessed it, New Economic Model (NEM). Unsurprisingly, a driving force behind this change is money: especially with the rise of China and India, Malaysia has in some senses become a less attractive investment destination. Last year, the government started to relax the requirement that 30% of all foreign investment have ethnic Malay (bumiputra) joint ventures.

To bring everyone up to speed, let us begin with Professor Quah describing the aftermath of the 1971 race riots:
In 1971, following racial riots, declaration of a state of national emergency, and suspension of Parliament, the then-Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak---father of the current Prime Minister---introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP). This policy sought to eradicate poverty regardless of race and to eliminate the identification of ethnicity with economic function. The enabler for both these goals would be rapid economic growth, the speedy expansion of the economic pie to divide across all Malaysians, so that no subgroup would feel absolutely disadvantaged. A key feature of the NEP was its effort to raise Bumiputra equity ownership from 2.4% in 1971 up to 30% within two decades.
However, foreign investors have been rather unfriendly to the NEP:
The large facts I've just described seemed to me (and many other observers) precisely the ones raising the critical, first-order challenges for economic policy in Malaysia. The problem was how to organize them coherently and understand their resolution. But there is, further, the other critical, first-order challenge unmentioned so far: namely, Malaysia's 40-year-old program of affirmative action.

I say unmentioned but of course that is not how the outside world viewed this. The international press emphasized most of all this dimension to Malaysia's policy framework; I will bring this out further in the discussion that follows. For now, however, I just note that some foreign financial houses I spoke to about NEAC [New Economic Advisory Council] work downplayed the significance of all the other problems I have mentioned. They said to me, "Malaysia needs to fix its affirmative-action program; everything else follows."
And so I've been interested in reading the entire report on the New Economic Model. Particularly interesting is how the Malaysia government plans to create--I kid you not--'market-friendly affirmative action' in response to longstanding criticisms of foreign investors to the policy climate in Indonesia. Here are the relevant bits on p. 10:
Inclusiveness is the second goal and a key part of the NEM. It is a prerequisite for fostering a sense of belonging. Pro-poor growth will warrant that no groups will be marginalised and the essential needs of the rakyat [ordinary citizens] will be satisfied. Families will be endowed with the opportunity and capabilities to pursue their aspirations in connected, sophisticated modern cities, townships and villages. They will live, work and study in localities free from the fear of crime, the indignity of discrimination, and the anxiety of need. Inclusiveness will enable all communities to contribute to and share in the wealth of the country. While perfect equality is impossible, an inclusive society will ensure that inequality does not worsen. Ethnically divided societies are more prone to violent conflicts. The multi-racial composition of the Malaysian population is still its outstanding feature and this ethnic diversity will always be with us. But the excessive focus on ethnicity-based distribution of resources has contributed to growing separateness and dissension.

A key challenge of inclusive growth is the design of effective measures that strike a balance between the special position of bumiputra and legitimate interests of different groups. Hence, the market-friendly affirmative action programmes in line with the principle of inclusiveness will:

- Target the assistance to the bottom 40% of households – of which 77.2% are bumiputera and many are located in Sabah and Sarawak;
- Ensure equitable and fair opportunities through transparent processes;
- Allow access to resources on the basis of needs and merit to enable improvement
in capacity, incomes and well-being;
- Have sound institutional framework for better monitoring and effective implementation;

Transparent and market-friendly affirmative action programmes focus on building capacity and capability of low-income households and small businesses, instead of imposing conditions to meet specific quotas or targets.

The ETP [Economic Transformation Programme] will provide for mechanisms to strengthen the capability of the bottom 40% so that they can take advantage of opportunities to secure better jobs, raise their productivity and grow their income. This group will be assisted with programmes to build skills so that they can use their entrepreneurial instincts
So there you have it. in a nutshell, NEM will involve capacity building among the most disadvantaged sectors of society in lieu of the NEP's system of quotas or targets. It will certainly be interesting to watch. In particular, I cannot help but salute their craftiness in moving towards (market-friendly) terminology of capacity-building and technical support.

Needless to say, problems of social cohesion are not unique to Malaysia, and the progress of the NEM will be closely watched.

Asian Crisis Countries: Greece Getting Off Lightly

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in ,, at 5/04/2010 09:32:00 AM
The following article had me pause a bit. Given that the budget tightening (and accompanying deflation since it cannot devalue its currency) demanded of Greece is so severe that the country is not expected by some to approach 2009-level GDP until 2017, how can anyone say Greece is getting off lightly? The answer: crisis-hit states of the Asian financial contagion.

Aside from the question of whether the IMF should be bailing out Greece in the first place since its woes can be construed as primarily fiscal and not balance of payments ones as per the IMF's mandate (though our friends at IPE@UNC demur), we have this. Basically, the arguments are twofold. First, the voting weights assigned to the IMF which still reflect a post-WWII economic order give unduly large priority to Europe. Hence, Europeans can give softer terms to Greece if they wish to. And second, the IMF seems to be no longer in the Washington Consensus-style business of remaking borrowing economies in America's image.

Given that even America itself no longer follows the Washington Consensus, it may be a good thing:
The International Monetary Fund’s proposed bail-out for Greece is being criticised by Asian countries, as they worry that Athens may be getting an easier ride than Asian countries during the Asian financial crisis in 1997/98.

Senior South Korean officials said austerity measures imposed in 1997/98 had been more draconian than those expected to be presented to Greece. They suggested that the apparent leniency reflected the substantial voting power of European countries on the IMF board.

One [South Korean] official joked that the “European Monetary Fund is located on 19th Street,” the fund’s address in Washington. However, none of the IMF’s five Asian voting members – China, Japan, India, South Korea and Thailand – appears to be preparing to oppose the deal when the package is presented to the 25-strong board.

Korn Chatikavanij, the Thai finance minister, said the “mistakes” made by the IMF in 1997/98 were “apparent”. Mr Korn added, however: “We are not going to begrudge the IMF for doing a better job, from using the lessons learnt from the missteps in Asia.” The IMF was widely criticised during and after the Asian financial crisis for the severity of conditions attached to its $41.3bn bail-out programme for Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea, which included bank closures, big public spending cuts and higher interest rates.

Grumbles about European influence reflect lingering resentment about the substantial voting power wielded on the IMF board by European countries, which largely reflects the distribution of economic power when it was founded in 1945.

In Seoul, officials appeared resigned to what they saw as double standards from the IMF and indicated that South Korea’s representative would take no action on the board. One official said he expected discussions on the board to be “smooth.” Another pointed out that the country “has no tradition of taking extreme positions”. South Korea’s presidency of the G20 group of leading economies gives it an added incentive to ensure a coherent IMF response to the Greek crisis.

Japan is understood to be giving strong support to the Greek package. Tokyo shares the sense of urgency felt in other developed nations on the issue and is concerned about possible market contagion in Asia, although there have been few signs of that yet. Japan is also anxious that the terms of the support package should be robust. The view from Tokyo is that some Asian developing countries may be unhappy with the IMF’s perceived generosity to Greece. However, Tokyo does not currently expect such unhappiness to threaten the creation and implementation of the eurozone-IMF package.

China has given no public hint of its stance, but there were no indications of any intention to delay or oppose the deal. European diplomats in Beijing said they were confident that Chinese would support the package. The Reserve Bank of India appeared concerned to ensure that the Greek crisis did not spread to Asia. There were no signs of unhappiness in New Delhi with the package being prepared for Greece.
Grumble, grumble. But why would Asian nations believe draconian measures are necessary for Greece when they themselves chafed at such measures being applied to them? In 1998, Richard Higgott coined the term "politics of resentment" to describe what crisis-hit Asian states felt at the time. In 2010, I guess they still are, well, resentful.

Also review some of the writings on proposed IMF reform that should help allay Asian nations' concerns that European ones still dominate the institution despite the changing geography of economic activity.

Greek FinMin Behind Goldman Swaps, Unplugged

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in , at 5/03/2010 12:47:00 AM
Following George W. Bush in Iraq and Wen Jiabao at Cambridge, I've come to the conclusion, boys and girls, that you're nobody in this world until people start throwing shoes at you. Recently, we almost had one such occasion here at the LSE as Yiannos Papantoniou, Greece's finance minister as it entered the Eurozone, came to speak. He is of course responsible for the use of currency swaps to (temporarily) disguise Greece's debts from national accounts to meet EMU entry criteria. It seems Goldman Sachs is in hot water on both sides of the Atlantic as Eurocrats are looking into its nefarious activities in implementing the Greek swaps. When queried about this, he's already said something along the lines of "everybody else did it, so why couldn't we?" Still, this sort of Enron-inspired accounting--since banned by the EU--has not endeared him to watchers of the current crisis unfolding in Hellas.

At any rate, he appeared last week for an LSE event on "The Greek Fiscal Crisis and the Future of the Euro-Zone." Maybe he should have appended "...And How I Helped Put It There." Snark aside, his evident non-disclosure of his less wholesome activities occasioned a rather outspoken member of the audience to berate him to the point that the moderator had to rein things in (catch the podcast and video of event in the link above for those). Suffice to say, he's lucky that he didn't get shoes thrown in his general direction!

What follows is the prepared text of his talk. Somewhat surprisingly, his suggestions make at least some sense. Particularly interesting is his suggestion that California is in as dire straits as Greece is, but the former benefits from the US having complementary fiscal and monetary mechanisms whereas there is asymmetry in the European project. There's also discussion of issuance of pan-European sovereign debt--something Germany is unlikely to assent to as he points out. As you'll read, his three main suggestions are: (1) beefing up enforcement and sactioning powers under the Stability and Growth Pact; (2) issuance of the aforementioned Eurobonds; and (3) emergency funding via a European Monetary Fund or suchlike:
Within the Eurozone, discussion has already started for longer-term arrangements aiming at improving economic governance. The issues involved include the reinforcement of the Eurogroup’s fiscal authority, the issuance of Eurobonds and the creation of a European Monetary Fund.

Stronger coordination of fiscal policies is essential for preventing diverging behaviour on the part of the member-countries of the Eurozone. Reinforcing the authority of the Eurogroup and the ECOFIN Council will improve the effectiveness of fiscal policy, particularly as regards meeting targets as well as redressing imbalances. Germany’s model, consisting in relying on export growth while constraining internal demand, has been heavily criticized recently. Germany’s surplus is mirrored in other countries’ deficits. And, when private demand is weak as is presently the case, external deficits are translated into fiscal deficits leading to credit crises.

Common budget policies and rigorous supervision of their implementation are a sine qua non condition for the efficient functioning of the Eurozone. They will also create a more balanced framework of cooperation with the ECB. Fiscal and monetary policies must function in better harmony in relation to the current situation so that the targets for growth, employment and inflation are more effectively pursued.

The issuance of Eurobonds covering the whole of the Eurozone could help relieve the pressure emanating from credit crises. Such bonds, however, are viewed with suspicion by Germany, which is reluctant to finance overindebted partners. A compensation mechanism imposing a corresponding charge on the weaker economies could help remove Germany’s reservations while serving her long-term interest in sustaining the stability and credibility of the common currency.

A more radical solution to the bail-out problem for failing economies would be the creation of a European Monetary Fund along the lines of the IMF. This fund could extend low-interest loans tied to strict conditionality ensuring the return of the deviant countries to fiscal balance and financial stability.

Unless the Eurozone develops procedures designed to transform it into a fully-fledged economic union, approaching the US model, the future of the euro will be clouded with doubt. Without strong institutions in the fiscal and financial field, the Eurozone will essentially remain a club of countries willing to adhere to certain principles of economic policy, such as price stability and fiscal discipline. Experience, however, suggests that voluntary adherence to principles does not stand the test of time. Deviance is a risk inherent in the life of any system. And if deviance is neither prevented nor controlled, the system faces the risk of dissolution.

It is, therefore, critical for the Eurozone to strengthen its system of governance. The effective conduct of economic policy in the USA contributes to the achievement of substantially higher rates of economic growth compared to the Eurozone. This, quite apart from the risks of break-up or dissolution, should suffice for mobilizing energies in Europe to speed up the integration process.
Still, you get the sense that had Greece managed its finances a bit less recklessly, he wouldn't have to talk about these things.

'Economics Envy Has Made IPE Boring as Heck'

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in at 5/03/2010 12:01:00 AM
Coming across the pond to present at our school, I had the pleasure of meeting renowned IPE scholar Benjamin Cohen. Having been in this business well before I was born, he certainly has the right to speak about its evolution as much as anyone. I've already lamented the general public unawareness of IPE at our neighbouring blog (which also makes a good summary of Cohen's thoughts on the current state of IPE). In a forthcoming contribution to International Studies Quarterly, however, he makes the broader point that contemporary IPE is simply not very memorable compared to what has been written in the past. Jerry Cohen believes that the overuse of what he calls "economistic mid-level theory" has hijacked the field--especially Stateside.

Here is the introduction; see what you make of it and the rest of the short article is well worth reading for those engaging in the discipline.
Are IPE journals becoming boring? The question is a serious one. Over the four decades or so since the modern field of International Political Economy was born, the character of what gets published in leading journals in the United States – IPE standard setters like International Organization, International Studies Quarterly, and World Politics – has changed dramatically. Arguably, the change has not been for the better.

To illustrate, consider a simple thought experiment. Think first of some of the memorable work published in the early years of the field – work like Keohane and Nye’s special International Organization issue on “Transnational Relations and World Politics,” published as a book in 1972; Peter Katzenstein’s 1976 IO essay on “International Relations and Domestic Structures, which in turn led to his special issue on “Between Power and Plenty,” also published as a book in 1978; or Stephen Krasner special issue on “International Regimes,” published in book form in 1983. Or think of Krasner’s 1976 World Politics study of “State Power and the Structure of International Trade”; Peter Gourevitch’s 1978 IO article on the second image reversed; John Ruggie’s 1982 IO essay on embedded liberalism; or Jeff Frieden’s 1991 IO paper on invested interests. All were seminal, foundational works – influential scholarship that is still widely read and cited.

Now compare these with anything that has appeared in mainstream journals over the last five to ten years. A great deal of quality research has been published, much of it making use of the most rigorous and up-to-date statistical methodologies. The intellectual candlepower is impressive. But how well does this work stack up against the output of earlier years? How much can be regarded as truly path breaking? How much is likely to be read or cited five to ten years from now? The answers, I think, are obvious. Our major journals are full of articles that are thoroughly peer-reviewed and edited with care. With rare exceptions, research meets the highest standards of scholarship. It’s just not very interesting.
Is creeping economism ruining IPE? Maybe we just need more rap videos (and Linda Ronstadt). The things I do to promote IPE to a wider audience...

Arizona Baseball: Taking a Bat to Racial Profiling

♠ Posted by Emmanuel in ,, at 5/01/2010 12:26:00 AM
I'm countin' down to the day deservin'
Fittin' for a King
I'm waitin' for the time when I can get to Arizona
Cause my money's spent on the goddamn rent
Neither party is mine
Not the jackass or the elephant

Unbeknownst to many, I studied for an MBA at Thunderbird in Glendale, Arizona. It was there where I first encountered International Political Economy and eventually set into motion the chain of events that's seen yours truly become an IPE blogger. Thunderbird is renowned among American B-schools for being tops in the speciality of international business for the longest time. Due to its concentration of IPE and area studies amongst more traditional business courses, I believe that I received a really good education which I still appreciate to this day.

So, it's with no passing familiarity that I believe I'm entitled to speak about goings-on in the Valley of the Sun. There has been much hullabaloo as of late Stateside about Arizona's implementation of the inflammatory SB 1070 (text here) aimed at cracking down on illegal immigration (text here). Among its most contentious provisions is the ability to stop those suspected of being illegal immigrants and force them to produce documents showing they are legally entitled to be in the state. This provision has led to concerns that persons of colour may be subject to racial profiling. Even those who are legally in the state can be inconvenienced by simply forgetting to carry now-required documents all the time.

I am naturally of the opinion that these measures are far too draconian. While in Arizona, I must say that I didn't feel inconvenienced at all despite obviously being a non-Caucasian. This, of course, may change entirely if and when SB 1070 is implemented. Historically, Arizona has had the knack of getting itself into trouble on matters concerning race relations. For instance, the lyrics above are from a Public Enemy number above which dates to 1991. Early Public Enemy wasn't long on subtlety--comparing black liberation to a violent jailbreak, for instance. Here, Chuck D's theme is, er, taking out the governor if he didn't make MLK Day a holiday. As with so many things dealing with Arizona, the story of celebrating Martin Luther King Day involves Senator John McCain (R-AZ):
The holiday went into effect in 1986. Only 27 states and D.C. honored the holiday that first year. Activists in state after state tried to prevent it from being recognized. In Arizona, a bill to recognize a holiday honoring MLK failed in the legislature, so then-Gov. Bruce Babbitt, a Democrat, declared one through executive order.

In January 1987, the first act of Arizona's new governor, Republican Evan Mecham, was to rescind the executive order by his predecessor to create an MLK holiday. Arizona's stance became a national controversy. McCain backed the decision at the time. But eventually he changed his mind.

In 1990, Arizonans were given an opportunity to vote to observe an MLK holiday. McCain successfully appealed to former President Ronald Reagan to support the holiday. In a letter to voters, Reagan wrote that he hoped Arizonans would "join me in supporting a holiday to commemorate these ideals to which Dr. King dedicated his life."

Mecham, for his part, opposed the holiday, saying, "I guess King did a lot for the colored people, but I don't think he deserves a national holiday." The 1990 referendum failed. And as a direct result, the National Football League rescinded its original decision to have Super Bowl XXVII played in Sun Devil Stadium in Tempe, Arizona.
Partly from pressure from the NFL, Arizona eventually made MLK Day a holiday via referendum in 1992. Still, it lost a lot of convention business and the 1993 Super Bowl for the delay. Now, however, there are ructions involving that other major American sport, baseball. It will be of no surprise to readers that I am a fan of the Arizona Diamondbacks because of the Arizona connection. It was during my time there that the great pitcher Randy Johnson came to the desert and spent the salad days of his Hall of Fame career. This may seem odd to my American readers but I know what a ground rule double and a 4-6-3 double play are. Just as hosting the Super Bowl XXVII was jeopardized by Arizona removing remembrance of MLK day, SB 1070 is threatening to endanger a sport even closer to the economic interests of the state.

To make a long story short, Arizona is one of the world's epicentres for baseball. Not only is a lot of Major League Baseball's spring training (or preseason) held there, but several minor leagues that feed into clubs at the major league level operate in the state, too. And, just as Super Bowl XXVII was successfully withdrawn from Arizona over pressure from the NFL with so many African-American players, the same dynamic may be in place here as players of Latin descent are obviously plentiful in Major League Baseball. What is more, Chase Field (formerly Bank One Ballpark before Bank One was acquired by Chase) is scheduled to host the 2011 All-Star Game. That too is coming under sustained pressure.

Once again demonstrating that you don't need to venture far to find material relevant to political economy, Yahoo's Jeff Passan had a good op-ed describing the potential economic costs to Arizona if SB 1070 is implemented:
Baseball’s entanglement in Arizona’s new immigration measure, Senate Bill 1070, goes well beyond the small swath of protestors demanding Major League Baseball pull the 2011 All-Star Game out of Phoenix and boycott Arizona Diamondbacks games. More than 1,000 players, and hundreds more executives, coaches, trainers and business staff, spend about eight weeks of spring training in the Phoenix area. Latin Americans represent 25-plus percent of major league players, and the percentage in the minor leagues is even higher. The sweeping reform, which critics say invites racial profiling, is almost certain to hit baseball if the federal government doesn’t intervene...

“There’s no distinguishing characteristic between an undocumented alien and someone who’s here legally,” said Glen Wasserstein, a partner with the Immigration Law Group in Washington. “How do you possibly have reasonable suspicion? Everybody of Hispanic orientation will be scrutinized. Why would you bring your passport and visa with you?”...

The 12 teams participating in the Arizona Rookie League each have at least six players from Spanish-speaking countries on their rosters. Latin Americans comprise more than 40 percent of the 317 players currently assigned to the league. Of the 28 players on the Oakland Athletics’ AZL team, 20 are from foreign countries, including 11 of 13 pitchers, eight of whom are Dominican and three of whom are Venezuelan.

The proliferation of Latinos in the game is why SB 1070 so frightens MLB and the MLB Players Association. While neither organization would comment, both are investigating how the law will affect players old and young, rich and poor, and how the sport can reconcile infusing hundreds of millions of dollars into the economy through spring training and the All-Star Game when more than a quarter of its constituents can be legally profiled...
And then there is specific trouble for the current owners of the Diamondbacks, in particular Republican supporter Ken Kendrick (known to us fans as Ken-Ken). There is talk of boycotting games when the D-Backs are on the road:
One source said MLB is unlikely to change the All-Star Game only 14 months before it is scheduled, though officials have discussed the potential ramifications. The scrutiny is even greater on the Diamondbacks. Ken Kendrick, the team’s managing partner, is a significant donor to the Republican Party, which SB 1070 opponents say railroaded the measure into law. The Diamondbacks released a statement that said Kendrick opposes the bill. Still, 40 protestors stood outside the Diamondbacks’ game in Chicago on Thursday, and more are expected at future games.

“It’s a real issue, and we wear Arizona on our chest, so we do represent the state,” Diamondbacks general manager Josh Byrnes said. “We’re insulated to some degree, but things that affect society at large affect us. We take a lot of pride in our representation from the Dominican Republic, Venezuela, Rodrigo Lopez from Mexico, Augie Ojeda(notes) growing up in California of Mexican descent. That’s what’s great about baseball. Every team has such great diversity.”

For now, at least. If [Us Attorney-General Eric] Holder doesn’t join the others filing suit against SB 1070 and it goes into effect, Latin American players almost certainly will avoid the Diamondbacks. Whether that aversion stretches to the other 14 teams with spring training in the Phoenix area is another question altogether.
The Arizona Republic has a lot more on how other local businesses may be hurt. For a state so reliant on tourism (think of the Grand Canyon, Flagstaff, and Sedona), the prospect of harassing anyone for not being white has the potential to put off many visitors. Add in boycotts of conventions and the state has not only a major image but also an economic problem. This time, the pink underwear sheriff Joe Arpaio has gone too far. McCain is on the spot too for supporting this measure as he keeps changing his mind on immigration matters. For someone who's supported amnesty in the past, it's a somewhat sudden about-face he's made in supporting SB 1070.

Illegal immigration as well as narcotic and human trafficking are serious problems that require more thoughtful measures than SB 1070. Based on my experience, Arizonans are not racist. It's just that their independent streak sometimes results in overreactions like this one. Now, like then, however, I ultimately believe that economic pressure will overturn this highly discriminatory measure. Otherwise, there will be hell to pay.

I don't like it at all.

UPDATE 1: Check out the normally conservative Arizona Republic (with a title like that...) unloading on the state's politicians for creating this mess. Then again, it name checks politicians from both parties.

upDATE 2: The same paper notes that violence isn't up on the AZ side of the border, contrary to media- and politician-fanned perceptions.